Unit planning begins with the standards. The state has adopted the Common Core State Standards, so that is where I begin. The following standards pertain to the idea of reading, analyzing, and writing arguments.
Key Ideas and Details
RI.8.1 Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
Integration of Knowledge and Ideas
RI.8.8 Trace and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, distinguishing claims that are supported by reasons and evidence from claims that are not.
Comprehension and Collaboration
S/L.8.3 Delineate a speaker’s argument and specific claims, evaluating the soundness of the reasoning and relevance and sufficiency of the evidence and identifying when irrelevant evidence is introduced.
Presentation of Knowledge and Ideas
S/L.8.4. Present information, findings, and supporting evidence, conveying a clear and distinct perspective, such that listeners can follow the line of reasoning, alternative or opposing perspectives are addressed, and the organization, development, substance, and style are appropriate to purpose, audience, and a range of formal and informal tasks.
Text Types and Purposes
W.8.1 Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence.
a. Introduce claim(s), acknowledge and distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and organize the reasons and evidence logically.
b. Support claim(s) with logical reasoning and relevant evidence, using accurate, credible sources and demonstrating an understanding of the topic or text.
c. Use words, phrases, and clauses to create cohesion and clarify the relationships among claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence.
d. Establish and maintain a formal style.
e. Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the argument presented.
Phrasing copy and pasted from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy.
Author Jim Burke has broken the standards down to help understand what is needed to produce the outcome. With this help, I created a list of objectives.
1. Define and identify the parts of an argument: claim, evidence, warrant, counterclaim, and rebuttal.
2. Define and identify types of claims: fact, values, and policy.
3. Distinguish between claims with support and those without support.
4. Define and identify some common fallacies use in argument.
5. Distinguish between arguments that are sound and those that have fallacies.
6. Define relevant/sufficient evidence and evaluate arguments based on those ideas.
7. Evaluate point of view with respect to spoken argument: subject, occasion, audience, purpose, and speaker.
8. Identify various propaganda techniques and how they may apply to a speaker’s message.
9. Evaluate a speaker’s argument with regards to claim and supporting evidence.
10. Distinguish between effective and ineffective spoken arguments and explain the differences.
Burke, Jim. The Common Core Companion, the Standards Decoded, Grades 6-8: What They Say, What They Mean, How to Teach Them. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Literacy, 2013. Print.
I then tweaked the objectives to create student clear targets in the form of “I Can” statements.
1. I can define and identify the parts of an argument.
2. I can define and identify types of claims.
3. I can distinguish between claims with support and those without support.
4. I can define and identify some common fallacies.
5. I can distinguish between arguments that are sound and those that have fallacies.
6. I can define relevant and sufficient evidence and evaluate arguments based on those ideas.
7. I can evaluate point of view with respect to spoken argument.
8. I can identify common propaganda techniques and how they apply to a speaker’s message.
9. I can evaluate a speaker’s argument with regards to claim and supporting evidence.
10. I can distinguish between effective and ineffective spoken arguments and explain the differences.
11. I can write an argument in a formal style that is logical and provides supporting details with credible references.
12. I can use words, phrases, and clauses to make my argument coherent and explain the relationships between and among claims, counterclaims, reasons, and evidence.